Anony Mous

Joined

• started 113 topics
• posted 3,363 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by Anony Mous

• 
  141

  My Prediction Regarding New Space Telescope That Will See Back to 100 Million Years From the Big Bang

  by Sea Breeze in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  a new space telescope launched a few days age that will supposedly be able to see to within 100 million years of the big bang.

  wow... only 100 million years from the big bang.

  that is pretty early given the 12 billion year age of the universe assigned by scholars who adhere to naturalism.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Anony Mous

  This article accurately ‘predicts’ the composition of galaxies at redshift 20 which is exactly what JWST is seeing:

  https://www.nature.com/articles/nature11177

  written in 2012 - your information is wrong.

  https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40668-014-0006-2 - 2015 - it is likely that Population III stars were much more massive than present-day stars

  A general description of structure formation in the early Universe may be found in Barkana and Loeb (2001), Loeb (2008), and Wiklind et al. (2013). The high-redshift IGM is discussed in Barkana and Loeb (2007) and Meiksin (2009), and the effects of the relative velocity offset between DM and baryons may be found in Fialkov (2014). The formation of the first stars in minihalos is reviewed in Bromm and Larson (2004), Glover (2005, 2013), and Bromm (2013), while the properties of the first galaxies are described in Bromm and Yoshida (2011), Johnson (2013), and Loeb and Furlanetto (2013). Less focused reviews of star formation at high redshifts may be found in Bromm et al. (2009) and Loeb (2010). Finally, feedback by Population III is summarized in Ciardi and Ferrara (2005).
  

  although simplistic calculations go back to 1967 (the quantum physics is extremely difficult), all the objections you regurgitate have been debunked starting in the 1970s. JWST is simply confirming these hypotheses. See, accurate predictions, confirmed with accurate data. Science reporting in the media is junk these days, stop reading the briefs on CNN and thinking you have an understanding.
• 
  141

  My Prediction Regarding New Space Telescope That Will See Back to 100 Million Years From the Big Bang

  by Sea Breeze in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  a new space telescope launched a few days age that will supposedly be able to see to within 100 million years of the big bang.

  wow... only 100 million years from the big bang.

  that is pretty early given the 12 billion year age of the universe assigned by scholars who adhere to naturalism.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Anony Mous

  A) you didn’t predict anything, you made a bad assumption based on a poorly written news article. Predicting something would mean you said something before the article was published.

  B) if you kept up with the actual science, you would’ve seen that JWST did not dispute anything, as a matter of fact, it confirms simulations of the Big Bang, what was unexpected is that we could actually see them with JWST. Now that at least 3 objects have been confirmed to be dark stars, the early reporting (which every serious science article said was preliminary data and needed to be reviewed) was just bad reporting.

  C) Genesis claims an 8000 year old universe where light, the earth and vegetation was created before the sun and stars, it also claims the moon emits light.
• 
  141

  My Prediction Regarding New Space Telescope That Will See Back to 100 Million Years From the Big Bang

  by Sea Breeze in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  a new space telescope launched a few days age that will supposedly be able to see to within 100 million years of the big bang.

  wow... only 100 million years from the big bang.

  that is pretty early given the 12 billion year age of the universe assigned by scholars who adhere to naturalism.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Anony Mous

  @Sea Breeze: why do people always want to promote their own YouTube vids or those of their particular denomination of crazies?

  I am not interested in seeing an hour long video on why the Bible cannot be challenged, the WTBTS has plenty of content. Can someone on your side write a scientific paper or summary based on the data which they don’t immediately have to retract (like the one you pointed at previously) from their own websites (not even getting to pre-print).
• 
  125

  Mandated Shunning is a Crime

  by Lee Marsh in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  mandated shunning is on the rise around the world with devastating effects on millions of people.

  shunning that is mandated by organized groups to its members is a form of both physical and psychological violence against those people being shunned and cut off from their family and life-long relationships.

  mandated shunning means that the shunning is ordered from the top down.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Anony Mous

  So , if a member of someone's family does something that warrants shunning and their family doesn't

  These days there are a lot of people that don’t strictly follow the shunning rules. First of all, people would need to report to the elders, the elders often have their own sons or daughters they should be shunning but don’t. So it really depends on congregation. At best nothing happens, at worst you lose ‘your privileges’ and get marked which many don’t want privileges anyway.
  You have to really openly disagree with the DF arrangement (basically become an apostate about it) in order to be DF’ed. I was in a very strict congregation, there was a person that kept visiting with his DF’ed daughter, even talking to her in the hall. He simply kept saying he was weak, eventually made it to ministerial servant (because they’re running out of people) and then faded from the borg shortly after I did.
  I have never heard of someone being DFed for simply ‘being weak’ about not talking to family. It may happen, but there are a lot of outs for people (there are various exceptions)
  

  
  
• 
  125

  Mandated Shunning is a Crime

  by Lee Marsh in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  mandated shunning is on the rise around the world with devastating effects on millions of people.

  shunning that is mandated by organized groups to its members is a form of both physical and psychological violence against those people being shunned and cut off from their family and life-long relationships.

  mandated shunning means that the shunning is ordered from the top down.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Anony Mous

  This is the problem with using government as a cudgel to do what you think is right. I believe people are hurt by the policy, but freedom is the only way to fight the policy, by enacting “government persecution” you are only confirming their biases.

  The biggest motivator for many of us to leave was to see how few people “outside” really cared about either us being a JW or the belief system they had. Step out into the world and everything except the few hours at the meeting is EXACTLY the same (in a free society), whatever you did as a JW (a group constituting 0.01% of the population) is inconsequential on the big stage, which is antithetical to what the WTBTS teaches, since if you are immersed it makes up 99% of your life so everything can be made into a threat.

  Even if you somehow made it apply (which you can’t without severely restricting the principles behind freedom of speech), nothing in the world would change for even 80-90% of JWs, the JWs themselves that both have disfellowshipped family AND strictly follow the precepts are a small minority.
• 
  65

  In Response to Anony Mous regarding the 144,000 and other questions...

  by EasyPrompt in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  still, you hold onto false teachings of the wtbts which are only there for the enrichment of its chiefs.. as pointed out, the rest of the book of revelation is figurative, yet you hold that the number 144,000 is literal.

  the wtbts currently says that this number is limited to those running the wtbts and that anyone claiming to be part of it outside that self-selecting group could be mentally ill.. by what reasoning (not from wtbts origin) do you believe only 144,000 people will be ‘saved’, and how do you know who is part of this self-selected group, given virtually no other religious denomination does even remotely believe in the literalism of revelation.

  do they have to be jws?

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Anony Mous

  5 pages and no answers to the original questions, except illusions of secret revelation which people seem to have copied straight from WTBTS publications.
• 
  43

  Who are the 144K Male Jewish Virgins in Revelation 7?

  by Sea Breeze in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  no mystery here.

  they are all male jewish virgins, just like scripture says.

  so, why all the muck and fuss?

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Anony Mous

  I haven’t looked into details on the original translation, but is it actually 2 different names in the original text or is that a later ‘translator’ addition?

  Also the listing is odd, there is a hidden meaning in the Jewish order of the names of the tribes, which Revelation breaks the ‘rhyme’.
• 
  60

  Sign of the Last Days

  by Fisherman in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  in the sermon on the mount, jesus foretold that earthquakes “in one place after another” would be part of the sign of the last days clímaxing in the great tribulation.. what could jesus possibly have meant?

  using a phone app nowadays, there are earthquakes detected in one place after another but is this what jesus meant and did they have so many earthquakes throughout the centuries affter his prophecy or are these modern day detected earthquakes unique to this epoch?

  how can we be sure unequivocally that modern day earthquakes are part of the sign fulfilling bible prophecy?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Anony Mous

  Correct, I understand the definition of worship here, however the Bible here says this control is total. The UN and every government strives to complete domination, yet they cannot attain it, because there are too many captains on the ship, cooks in the kitchen etc.

  The British Empire for example had more power back in its day over more people than the UN today does. I would suggest starting from scratch on all these interpretations, as remnants of WTBTS interpretation often poisons the mind.

  The UN is totally ineffectual, as is any congregation of people. The UN and WEF and similar organizations is an extension of socialism/communism into the world of politics, by definition it must fail in a capitalist world. Hence the beast cannot be based in those, it must be based in a unified approach to something else, capitalism sets up markets in opposition to each other. Therefore I can’t believe that the beast is pointing towards a modern day body politics or one that has arrived yet.

  There once was a body politics that had captured the entire ‘known’ world, and that was when this scripture was written, the Romans seemingly had captured all of the known world. Hence I believe the interpretation must be in its own day when scripture was written and the beast was a form of government (Roman senate) that breathed life into another form of government (the Roman dictator).
• 
  65

  In Response to Anony Mous regarding the 144,000 and other questions...

  by EasyPrompt in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  still, you hold onto false teachings of the wtbts which are only there for the enrichment of its chiefs.. as pointed out, the rest of the book of revelation is figurative, yet you hold that the number 144,000 is literal.

  the wtbts currently says that this number is limited to those running the wtbts and that anyone claiming to be part of it outside that self-selecting group could be mentally ill.. by what reasoning (not from wtbts origin) do you believe only 144,000 people will be ‘saved’, and how do you know who is part of this self-selected group, given virtually no other religious denomination does even remotely believe in the literalism of revelation.

  do they have to be jws?

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Anony Mous

  Mark 4:11-12

  And he said to them, “To you has been given the secret of the kingdom of God, but for those outside everything is in parables, so that “‘they may indeed see but not perceive, and may indeed hear but not understand, lest they should turn and be forgiven.’”

  1 Corinthians 2:1-16

  And I, when I came to you, brothers, did not come proclaiming to you the testimony of God with lofty speech or wisdom. For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ and him crucified. And I was with you in weakness and in fear and much trembling, and my speech and my message were not in plausible words of wisdom, but in demonstration of the Spirit and of power, so that your faith might not rest in the wisdom of men but in the power of God. ...

  
  

  But now I fear that you will be tricked, just as Eve was tricked by that lying snake. I am afraid that you might stop thinking about Christ in an honest and sincere way. We told you about Jesus, and you received the Holy Spirit and accepted our message. But you let some people tell you about another Jesus. Now you are ready to receive another spirit and accept a different message... Anyway, they are no more than false apostles and dishonest workers. They only pretend to be apostles of Christ. And it is no wonder. Even Satan tries to make himself look like an angel of light. (2 Corinthians 11:3, 4, 13, 14 CEV).

  As he does in all his letters when he speaks in them of these matters. There are some things in them that are hard to understand, which the ignorant and unstable twist to their own destruction, as they do the other Scriptures.

  Acts 17:11

  Now these Jews were more noble than those in Thessalonica; they received the word with all eagerness, examining the Scriptures daily to see if these things were so.

  Revelation 1:1 - The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show to his servants the things that must soon take place.

  
  

  But test all things. Hold on to what is good (1 Thessalonians 5:21 HCSB).

  
  

  Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, because many false prophets have gone out into the world (1 John 4:1 NASB).

  
  

  I ask you to test the spirit, which you call blasphemous to test the spirit (the WTBTS FDS does the same thing FYI) yet you cannot produce even a shred of scriptural evidence of your claims, that goes to show you are a false prophet in league with the WTBTS. It cannot be blasphemy to test the spirit, to ask for evidence from scripture.
• 
  65

  In Response to Anony Mous regarding the 144,000 and other questions...

  by EasyPrompt in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  still, you hold onto false teachings of the wtbts which are only there for the enrichment of its chiefs.. as pointed out, the rest of the book of revelation is figurative, yet you hold that the number 144,000 is literal.

  the wtbts currently says that this number is limited to those running the wtbts and that anyone claiming to be part of it outside that self-selecting group could be mentally ill.. by what reasoning (not from wtbts origin) do you believe only 144,000 people will be ‘saved’, and how do you know who is part of this self-selected group, given virtually no other religious denomination does even remotely believe in the literalism of revelation.

  do they have to be jws?

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Anony Mous

  It’s easy to claim things without proof. Plenty of people claim things with Holy Spirit, this makes you no better than the FDS. By Holy Spirit I declare you false prophets since you refuse to answer simple logical questions. The devil is an Angel of false light, you are being misled by WTBTS circular reasoning. Again, the questions are open, answer them honestly from scripture, I will consider this over until such time.